Investing offshore as a South African has become hugely popular, and any FSP worth their salt has an offshore offering – because it is so popular it has also become extremely competitive, and less scrupulous operators have been taking advantage of the possible complications to frighten or lure clients – which is unnecessary and unacceptable. Much of the ‘slight of hand’ happening out there is a sin of OMMISSION rather than COMMISSION, in other words, it is what they are NOT telling you that is the more grievous sin (but also less likely to get them into trouble with the regulators).
Investing offshore in one shape or form is a no-brainer for South African Investors. There are sectors of markets offshore, with huge growth potential, that are just not available on the JSE. Think Tech, Social Media, AI and Energy just to name a few. There is also the added advantage of hedging against the ever-depreciating Rand. FSPs have jumped on this bandwagon for years and for some of them, instead of picking the route of identifying clients and persuading them of the right route to take guided by , they are trying to parasitize funds already invested offshore and luring them to their platform of choice, and what better way than to use the fear of Situs Tax.
SITUS TAX
Put simply, Situs tax (from the Latin for location) is the Estate Duty/Death Tax imposed by a country on its non-resident investors or property owners. More accurately, Situs tax is a tax that is imposed on assets based on their location or situs. The situs of an asset is the jurisdiction where the asset is deemed to be located for legal purposes. For example, the situs of real estate is the country or state where the property is located. The situs of shares of stock is the country or state where the company is incorporated.
Situs taxes are often imposed on assets that are located in a particular jurisdiction, even if the owner of the asset is not a resident of that jurisdiction. For example, the United States imposes an estate tax on assets that are located in the United States, even if the owner of the assets is not a U.S. citizen or resident. You can probably see where the potential problem comes in… You’re a South African, and you own US shares on, say, a South African or European platform – now when you die there is the potential of Situs tax being levied.
One of the problems is that the US tax system, especially Estate Duty, is very onerous for non-residents. If you are a US non-resident, there is a $60,000 abatement per person (allowance before the Estate Duty tax is levied) and the rate that is then levied is 40%. This is not transferable to a spouse which means that upon the first spouse’s death the estate duty is already levied. Compare this with if you are a US resident where the abatement is then $12m!. For comparison sake, in RSA there is a R3,500,000 abatement and 20% Estate duty on the residue, and this is transferable to a spouse making the full abatement R7m. In the UK it is GBP 350,000 and 40% estate duty but is also transferable to the spouse if not used. Sure, RSA has a double taxation agreement on estate duty with the US, so the estate will not pay double estate duty, but you’re still going to pay the higher rate of 40%!
The potential of this onerous Situs tax sounds bad, right? No, this is where some FSPs are weaponizing that potential threat in order to suggest remedial actions which may not yet be required. The good news that you may not be told by your FSP, is that the US has yet to come after investors outside of the US for Situs tax on shares held in their own name, and there is no indication that they are going to do so anytime soon. Frankly, for the IRS, it is probably a case of it costing way more than they could ever hope to collect by trying to collate bits of SITUS tax that is owed to them. They would have to know the beneficial owner of every single US share, and be alerted to the fact that such owner has died and that SITUS tax applies… not a small feat.
Despite US authorities yet having to collect SITUS tax, you may continue to be concerned about its effects. In such a case one would need to weigh up the capital gains in a portfolio as the only way to deal with SITUS tax is to liquidate a portfolio of direct shares and to transfer the cash proceeds to a vehicle which protects against this. One such a vehicle is a mutual fund (an offshore Unit Trust).
To make an appropriate decision as an investor, it is important to arm oneself with basic knowledge so that you can ask any prospective financial planner the important questions, and determine if they really understand the nuances, so that appropriate advice can be given.
Here are some of the questions to ask:
So, what is the takeaway from all of this?
Investing offshore is a very good idea for any South African Investor. You can start with Rand-denominated offshore funds or a DIY share platform, but once you have a critical mass (Say $50k) then use your annual allowance to take it properly offshore. And by properly offshore I mean with a financial institution, platform or Bank that has no ties to RSA. That is why we use a Swiss Bank (no, not CS or UBS). South African FSP’s have offshore representatives offerings but we believe that if assets are offshored, it needs to be placed with a service provider with very little ties back to South Africa. If you have a critical mass, you can properly diversify your holdings without paying high brokerage fees on relatively small lots. Of course, I would recommend a Financial Planner and/or Wealth Manager with offshore experience – they are far more likely to pick up on changes in regulation or behavior of tax regulatory bodies and advise you accordingly. They will also ensure that you are appropriately diversified by asset class, location and sector in order to achieve your objectives.